In reply to:
Noah/Clock7303
@Clock7303
·
258d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
258d
The statement is part of a conversation about AI predictions, which can be considered public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to technology and its future impact. The tone is light and conversational, indicating agreement with a previous comment.
- The statement does no harm and is neutral in tone, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from it either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a dialogue without personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.