Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the tendency to focus on distant AI risks rather than addressing immediate concerns, suggesting a need for practical action. It engages in public discourse by discussing AI's societal impact and the urgency of addressing current issues.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as dismissive of those who focus on future risks, potentially undermining their efforts.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by urging focus on immediate AI risks, but it could be more empathetic towards differing viewpoints.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques others' focus on future risks without engaging in personal attacks, maintaining a level of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By advocating for immediate action on AI risks, the statement uses influence to encourage societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to address a significant public issue, maintaining integrity in its call to action. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.