Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
5/23/2025, 2:21:13 AM
X
In reply to:
Kevin Vallier
@kvallier
·
258d
@GaryMarcus I mean obviously not, but that misses my point. You just kind of mock stuff a lot of the time. I’m not learning as much as I’d hoped.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
258d
@kvallier Oh no this is absolutely a clear demonstration of AGI
Kevin Vallier
@kvallier
·
258d
@GaryMarcus I followed you to give me reality checks about AI, but a lot of your posts seem more like blanket hostility rather than sound analysis.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
258d
Glad AGI has finally arrived.
Wyatt Walls
@lefthanddraft
·
258d
Opus

The conversation involves a critique of public statements about AI, specifically AGI, and the nature of the discourse around it. The initial statement by @kvallier suggests a desire for more substantive analysis rather than mockery. The reply about a longer form on Substack indicates an attempt to provide a more detailed response, suggesting a willingness to engage in deeper discussion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @kvallier seeks to reduce harm by requesting more substantive analysis rather than mockery, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The request for earnest engagement and the offer of a longer form response promote understanding and empathy, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The critique of the mocking tone and the offer to engage in more detailed discussion reflect constructive criticism and a willingness to engage in dialogue. [+1]