Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
5/23/2025, 2:25:19 AM
X
In reply to:
Kevin Vallier
@kvallier
·
258d
@GaryMarcus It is. I’ll subscribe.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
258d
@kvallier Longer form in my substack, if your desire is earnest.
Kevin Vallier
@kvallier
·
258d
@GaryMarcus I mean obviously not, but that misses my point. You just kind of mock stuff a lot of the time. I’m not learning as much as I’d hoped.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
258d
@kvallier Oh no this is absolutely a clear demonstration of AGI
Kevin Vallier
@kvallier
·
258d
@GaryMarcus I followed you to give me reality checks about AI, but a lot of your posts seem more like blanket hostility rather than sound analysis.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
258d
Glad AGI has finally arrived.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the quality of analysis provided by a public figure, Gary Marcus. The conversation involves critique and discussion about the nature of AGI and the perceived tone of Marcus's commentary.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the critique could be perceived as dismissive or mocking, which might indirectly cause harm by undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by expressing a desire for more substantive analysis rather than hostility, which aligns with promoting empathy and understanding. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by expressing dissatisfaction with the tone of the commentary, but it risks being perceived as a personal attack rather than focusing solely on the content of the analysis. [-1]