The statement critiques the AI industry's tendency to overpromise and shift negative consequences onto consumers. It reflects public skepticism about AI, as shown in the Pew data, where the public is more negative about AI's impact compared to experts. The statement uses strong language, suggesting frustration with the industry's perceived arrogance and lack of accountability.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by using accusatory language, potentially escalating tensions between the industry and the public. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but may not fully respect the dignity of those in the AI industry by implying they act like 'gods.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism, as it lacks specific suggestions for improvement and uses a confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.