In reply to:
Thomas G. Dietterich
@tdietterich
·
256d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the nature and evaluation of AI, particularly in the context of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and its benchmarks. It critiques the focus on generality over specific intelligence and questions the criteria used to assess AI's capabilities.
- The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a respectful tone, contributing to a constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying misconceptions about AI and intelligence, encouraging a more nuanced view. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the ideas presented without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly contributing to the discourse on AI with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.