Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement critiques a perceived inconsistency in Anthropic's stance on AI development, suggesting a shift from caution to advancement. It highlights concerns about the integrity of safety promises in AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies potential harm from broken promises in AI safety, but does not directly cause harm itself.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on organizational actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive criticism by pointing out perceived inconsistencies, though it could be more balanced.