Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement uses a sarcastic tone to highlight the disparity between public sentiment and expert opinion on AI, as shown in the Pew Research data. It implies that certain groups ('tech bros' and 'AI shills') are dismissive of public concerns. The intent seems to be to provoke thought and discussion about the differing perspectives on AI.
- The statement does not directly harm but uses a mocking tone that could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of those it labels as 'tech bros' and 'AI shills,' potentially engaging in mild cyberbullying. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by encouraging discussion on public sentiment versus expert opinion, but the tone may hinder empathy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and uses derogatory language, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.