Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement discusses the limitations of transformer-based architectures and the role of system prompts, which can be considered a public discourse as it addresses a technical issue relevant to AI systems and their impact on society.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of concerns about AI control, which might indirectly cause misunderstanding.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, as it dismisses opposing views without fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement implies that those who disagree are incorrect, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement addresses free speech and the responsible use of AI systems, but it does not fully explore the implications of its claims.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.