In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
253d
The statement and images highlight errors made by language models in basic arithmetic, supporting the claim that LLMs can be unreliable. The tone is critical, aiming to emphasize the need for caution when relying on AI for factual information.
- The statement does not cause harm but highlights a potential issue with AI reliability. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the technology rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- Engages in constructive criticism of AI capabilities without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.