Barbara Rich
@BarbaraRich_law
·
254d
The statement and the conversation it refers to engage with a public issue concerning the integrity of legal professionals and the impact of media on public perception of AI in legal contexts. The tone is critical and concerned, aiming to highlight failures in legal education and professional conduct.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights potential harm caused by misinformation and professional misconduct.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by pointing out issues in legal education and professional practice, encouraging a discussion on improving these areas. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the legal profession and media portrayal without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By addressing issues in legal education and media influence, the statement uses its platform to advocate for better standards and practices. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing public issues related to legal practice and media influence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.