Gary Marcus

The statement and linked content engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of AI literacy and its implications in the legal field, particularly concerning the misuse of AI-generated information in legal proceedings. The tone is critical and aims to highlight the consequences of inadequate understanding and communication about AI's limitations.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights potential harm caused by misinformation and lack of AI literacy.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by discussing the importance of AI literacy and the risks of misinformation. [+2]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of media hype and legal education without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to advocate for better AI literacy, which could benefit society by preventing legal mishaps. [+2]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing the societal impact of AI misinformation. [+1]