The statement addresses a public issue concerning the quality of biomedical research papers linked to AI, suggesting a potential problem in scientific integrity. The tone is critical and suggests a warning about the misuse of AI in research.
- The statement aims to highlight a potential harm in scientific research, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The mention of being called a 'hater' could be seen as a personal attack, which slightly violates the principle of respecting others' dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of a significant issue in research, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the use of AI in research, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.