Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
5/25/2025, 12:49:00 AM
X
In reply to:
Ely Rabani #GazaTruceNow
@radsci
·
251d
@GaryMarcus @AdrianDittmann @elonmusk Recent top tier models don’t seem to have the prior arithmetic glitches in my experience.

With slightly different numbers (as I
expected):
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
251d
@AdrianDittmann @elonmusk i can’t replicate it, though
Adrian Dittmann
@AdrianDittmann
·
251d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk https://x.com/i/grok/share/li6ic…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
251d
When I offered @elonmusk a million dollar bet that AI wouldn’t be smarter than the smartest human by the end of 2025 I was confident I would win the bet.

I figured I could make a list with dozens, maybe hundreds, of things ordinary people could do that eluded many or most
Liron Shapira
@liron
·
251d
This is the new Claude 4 Sonnet with extended thinking mode on.

Surprising that it doesn't have a better mental model of basic arithmetic at this point in the game — I'm somewhat confused.

H/T @GaryMarcus

The conversation revolves around the performance of AI models in basic arithmetic tasks. The tone is analytical and somewhat humorous, focusing on the limitations of AI in handling simple calculations. The participants engage in a light-hearted critique of AI capabilities, referencing specific examples of arithmetic errors.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is part of a technical discussion about AI capabilities. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding of AI limitations and encourages critical thinking about technology. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is constructive, with participants sharing observations and examples without personal attacks. [+1]