Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 69
5/25/2025, 6:51:44 AM
X
In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
52d
“We don’t primary incumbent Presidents” and “She’s a spoiler” were lies to begin with. They invisiblized and erased anyone who wasn’t a member of their little club then, and they’re still doing it. It’s important to see this; otherwise nothing will be different in 2028.
2/3
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
52d
The idea of an “insider political class” was the problem to begin with; traditional political voters thinking they should just leave it to the DC insiders to determine who the candidate should be is what got us here. 1/3
Cenk Uygur
@cenkuygur
·
53d
I can live with the media saying they missed the Biden story if they were to go back and apologize to all the people who tried to warn others about it. But they never do. Did a single person in mainstream media apologize to @marwilliamson, @RepDeanPhillips or me?

I know,

The statement critiques the 2024 Democratic primary process, alleging suppression of campaigns other than Biden-Harris and labeling it a PR stunt. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of political transparency and fairness in elections.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm individuals but implies criticism of a group, which could be seen as harmful to their reputation. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but criticizes a political process. Neutral.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. Minor violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, using terms like 'PR stunt' and 'audacity,' which could be seen as personal attacks. Moderate violation. [-2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes. Neutral.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight perceived issues in the political process, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment. Minor alignment. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible in its tone. Neutral.