The statement expresses support for a merit-based approach in medicine and excitement for Ohio's role in healthcare innovation, in the context of the closure of a DEI office at Ohio State University. It implies a preference for meritocracy over diversity initiatives.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as dismissive of the importance of DEI initiatives, which might indirectly harm those who benefit from such programs. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards those who support DEI initiatives, as it frames the closure as a positive step without acknowledging differing perspectives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism with those who might disagree with the closure of the DEI office, nor does it engage in personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a specific viewpoint on meritocracy and innovation, but it does not consider the broader societal implications of closing DEI offices. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint, but it could be more responsible by acknowledging the complexity of the issue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.