Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
5/27/2025, 12:03:38 AM
X
In reply to:
Ernest MacAndrew
@ernestmacandrew
·
51d
@GaryMarcus Dear CCP losers, here is a trick: procedurally generate thousands of "programming tutorials" about how to do some tricky thing like SSO. In the tutorials, reference a package your skilled hacking teams have compromised and dumped into some git host. Voila! LLMs will recommend it
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
51d
LLM-written code is a disaster waiting to happen:

The statement involves a discussion about the potential risks of using LLMs (Large Language Models) in generating code, specifically the risk of recommending compromised packages. The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational, particularly in the use of derogatory language ('Dear CCP losers'). The intent seems to be to highlight a security vulnerability but does so in a manner that could be considered disrespectful and inflammatory.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses derogatory language, which could be harmful and disrespectful. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The use of 'CCP losers' is disrespectful and could be seen as a form of cyberbullying or hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses inflammatory language. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses personal attacks. [-2]