Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement is a critique of a book that discusses President Biden's administration, suggesting it operates as a 'shadow government.' It engages with public issues by addressing concerns about governance and transparency, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but the use of terms like 'shadow government' could be seen as inflammatory, potentially inciting distrust without evidence. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques a public figure, which is generally acceptable in public discourse. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical without offering constructive solutions or fostering dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques the administration's actions rather than engaging in personal attacks. It does not use ad hominem arguments. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to critique a public figure, which is a responsible use of the platform. However, the tone could be more balanced to ensure integrity. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.