Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 50
5/27/2025, 2:41:42 PM
X
In reply to:
Peter Voss
@peterevoss
·
19d
@Kasparov63 @GaryMarcus It would be good if more in the AI field started thinking from first principles https://aigo.ai/agi-from-first-p…
Garry Kasparov
@Kasparov63
·
19d
AI is getting so good at being confidently wrong that the occupation it most threatens is politician! 🤡🤖 Looking forward to talking to @GaryMarcus today about where it all went wrong…
Dan Shipper 📧
@danshipper
·
21d
I told Claude Opus 4 that scientists invented a perpetual motion machine that it doesn’t know about because of its knowledge cut off.

Then I asked it to predict how it works:

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the importance of foundational thinking in AI development. It references a conversation about AI's potential pitfalls and the need for a principled approach to AGI. The tone is constructive, aiming to promote deeper understanding and dialogue in the AI field.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes a thoughtful approach to AI, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by encouraging responsible development. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It fosters understanding and empathy by advocating for a foundational approach to AI, which can lead to more robust and ethical systems. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a conversation about AI's challenges, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]