In reply to:
Shakeel
@ShakeelHashim
·
17d
The statement critiques Sam Altman's response to a question about his credibility, suggesting he avoided addressing it directly. This engages in public discourse by discussing the transparency and accountability of a public figure involved in AI development.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies a lack of transparency, which could be seen as indirectly harmful if it undermines trust without evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy or compassion, focusing instead on criticism without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive feedback or engage in dialogue, leaning towards a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.