Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 48
5/27/2025, 6:42:12 PM
X
In reply to:
Dileep George
@dileeplearning
·
13d
@GaryMarcus I can be. What is the concrete thing you want to discuss?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
13d
@dileeplearning this conversation would become more interesting if you were more concrete and more specific
Dileep George
@dileeplearning
·
13d
@GaryMarcus imo there is no fundamental solution but a series of principled mitigations.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
13d
@dileeplearning O4 was a step back; are there any principled solutions to hallucinations?
Dileep George
@dileeplearning
·
13d
@GaryMarcus There has been a lot of progress on reducing hallucinations. But ofc there will still be boneheaded errors.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
14d
@dileeplearning Depends obviously on the domain, and I have acknowledged a zillion times (if not that in that tweet) that they are useful (e.g. for coding and brainstorming), in my last book, in numerous tweets etc.

I don’t think there has been all that much progress on hallucinations;

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of AI hallucinations and their mitigation. The conversation involves a substantive engagement with public issues related to AI technology and its challenges.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for specific examples of mitigations, which encourages a more detailed and informative discussion. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]