Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 47
5/27/2025, 7:00:36 PM
X
In reply to:
Dan Shipper 📧
@danshipper
·
12d
@GaryMarcus @Kasparov63 “I may have jumped to conclusions too quickly” is another alternative!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
12d
@danshipper @Kasparov63 1. true, i may have been mislead by your tweet about it
2. i would curious to see the full transcript
Dan Shipper 📧
@danshipper
·
12d
@GaryMarcus @Kasparov63 it did. i had to modify the prompt a bunch for it not to
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
12d
@danshipper @Kasparov63 Perhaps it should have said, “that’s science fiction but here are some things one could imagine.”
Dan Shipper 📧
@danshipper
·
12d
@Kasparov63 @GaryMarcus I assume you haven't actually tried this prompt yourself!

If you had, you'd have found that its first response is always, "this is not possible and violates the laws of physics."

The point of the exercise is not to actually invent a perpetual motion machine—which is obviously
Garry Kasparov
@Kasparov63
·
12d
AI is getting so good at being confidently wrong that the occupation it most threatens is politician! 🤡🤖 Looking forward to talking to @GaryMarcus today about where it all went wrong…

The statement appears to be part of a lighthearted exchange about AI and its limitations, specifically regarding a hypothetical perpetual motion machine. The tone is informal and slightly humorous, with a hint of frustration. It does not engage in substantive public discourse on societal issues or policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm; it is more of a personal expression of frustration.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    There is no violation of privacy or dignity; the tone is informal and conversational.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, but it is not intended to.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    There is no constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a personal reaction.