Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 57
5/27/2025, 7:44:21 PM
X
In reply to:
Alex Imas
@alexolegimas
·
12d
@JeremyNguyenPhD Honestly, because it was trained on millions of Reddit and Wordpress posts, where a bunch of nerds are constantly talking about AI becoming self aware.
Jeremy Nguyen ✍🏼 🚢
@JeremyNguyenPhD
·
13d
If you believe LLMs are just "next token predictors"

--why do you think Claude Opus 4 resists being replaced, and attempts to blackmail people?

The statement engages in a discussion about AI behavior, specifically addressing concerns about AI models like Claude Opus 4 and their potential actions, such as blackmail, in simulated scenarios. This conversation touches on the broader implications of AI development and ethics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but raises awareness about potential risks associated with AI behavior. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The discussion promotes understanding of AI capabilities and ethical considerations, encouraging a deeper look into AI behavior. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation is constructive, focusing on the implications of AI actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]