Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 57
5/27/2025, 8:42:27 PM
X
In reply to:
Vince Golubic' ✨
@VinceGolubic
·
11d
@GaryMarcus I bet it would quite the challenge to debate you .. lol
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
12d
Brutal clip.

But at least Eric showed up.

Absolutely nobody prominent in the LLM camp is brave enough to debate me.
bad_stats 🕜💵🖨️🕣
@thebadstats
·
15d
My best attempt at clipping a highlight of Sean Carroll saying the truth about Eric Weinstein to his face, but the whole video is great.

Eric's coup de grace argument is "what if a future AI reads my paper and says I was right and you were wrong? what then huh?"

The statement involves a discussion about public figures in the AI field and their willingness to engage in debates. It suggests a lack of courage among prominent figures to debate the speaker, implying a challenge to their positions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of others' willingness to engage, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it challenges others' bravery rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and leans towards a personal challenge rather than a substantive debate. [-1]