Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques a new grading policy in San Francisco public schools, suggesting it may lower academic standards by eliminating homework and tests from final grades, allowing multiple attempts at final exams, and adjusting grade thresholds. The tone is critical, implying the policy may not effectively measure student performance.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm to educational standards, suggesting the policy may not adequately prepare students. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism without exploring potential benefits of the policy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or suggestions for improvement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.