Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -202
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
43d

The statement discusses a U.S. policy to deny visas to foreign officials involved in censorship, highlighting its potential application to specific individuals. It engages in public discourse by addressing international relations, censorship, and visa policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to inform about a policy that could impact international relations, potentially doing harm if not carefully applied. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy by not disclosing unnecessary personal details but mentions specific individuals, which could impact their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on policy implications.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It presents a critical view of foreign censorship without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to discuss a policy that could influence international behavior regarding censorship. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    It upholds free speech by discussing measures against censorship, aligning with the principle of responsible platform use. [+1]