Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is a critical commentary on the perceived corruption during the Trump presidency, comparing it to corruption in post-Soviet and postcolonial African contexts. It aims to highlight concerns about self-enrichment and corruption in the White House, contributing to public discourse on governance and ethics.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it could be seen as disrespectful by making broad comparisons to other nations. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily critical and accusatory. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses strong language and comparisons that could be seen as personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about perceived corruption, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by calling for accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion, but the responsibility and integrity of the language used could be questioned.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.