Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 68
5/29/2025, 8:06:39 AM
X
In reply to:
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
53d
@marwilliamson If this isn't about taxpayer money then I'm sure the university will be fine losing their federal funding.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
53d
@DeAngelisCorey You think any conversation about race is "racial indoctrination?" I think that very idea is fascist indoctrination, convincinh people government has a right to tell us what to talk about. An administration wasting money on constant golf trips, military parades and retrofitting
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
53d
Discuss whatever you want. Don't force taxpayers to pay for racist indoctrination.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
53d
@DeAngelisCorey So you think it’s basically OK for the government to tell people what they can and cannot discuss, and you think you’re doing the work of ethical journalism by “exposing” a fellow citizen for saying she’s going to talk about whatever she wants to talk about because this is a free

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to taxpayer funding, university policies, and perceived threats to free speech and democracy. It critiques the actions of a political figure and calls for ethical journalism, indicating a substantive engagement with public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language, such as 'encroaching dictatorship,' which could be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful, thus partially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the tone could be perceived as dismissive towards a political group, which slightly violates the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting the need for ethical journalism, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement critiques a political figure and their actions without engaging in personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech by addressing public concerns and calls for responsible journalism, aligning with the principle of using one's platform responsibly. [+1]