Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques a group of people who claim to defend the Constitution but allegedly lack understanding or respect for its principles. It engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of constitutional interpretation and political power.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as dismissive of a group, which may indirectly cause harm by fostering division. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the opposing viewpoint without attempting to understand or engage with it constructively. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it generalizes and dismisses a group without addressing specific arguments or engaging in a meaningful discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.