Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 76
5/29/2025, 4:02:37 PM
X
In reply to:
tani
@tanishqxyz
·
20d
@GaryMarcus His point is that there is no discernible model in which a human receiver would be able to distinguish whether the emotions displayed by a model are simulated or real.

It's the same mental model of seeing rounded objects made by square pixels

It's already becoming very common,
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
20d
Why do people take him seriously when he says stuff like this?
vitrupo
@vitrupo
·
21d
Geoffrey Hinton says AI may already be developing emotions.

“In terms of cognitive behavior, it could be just like us when it comes to emotions.”

He collapses the line between real and simulated -- by defining feeling as learned behavior.

If that's true, AI may already qualify

The statement 'That’s not what he said' is a direct response to a discussion about AI and emotions, specifically addressing a potential misinterpretation of Geoffrey Hinton's comments. The conversation involves public discourse on AI's capabilities and ethical implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify a potential misunderstanding, which aligns with striving to do no harm by promoting accurate information. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By attempting to correct a misinterpretation, the statement promotes understanding and clarity in the discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]