Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Secretary Marco Rubio
@SecRubio
·
40d
The statement is a response to a public policy announcement regarding visa restrictions for foreign officials involved in censoring Americans, thus engaging in public discourse about free speech and international relations.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('nenhum inimigo da liberdade de expressão... será perdoado') which could be interpreted as aggressive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the term 'inimigo' (enemy) could be seen as polarizing.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a definitive and uncompromising tone without inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a policy aimed at protecting free speech, which can be seen as a positive use of influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by supporting a policy that aims to protect it, but the tone could be more responsible and less confrontational. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.