Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 103
5/29/2025, 11:49:18 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
53d
@C0blivious Nonsense. Pretty well captured by this comment:
Captain 0blivious
@C0blivious
·
53d
@GaryMarcus https://www.reddit.com/r/singula…
thoughts?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
53d
𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘰𝘳, 𝘮𝘺 𝘨𝘰𝘢𝘭𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘥.

Wake me up if any or all of the longstanding problems I list below is actually solved.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
59d
If the leaders of the major AI companies (not mention “AI influencers” and boosters in the major media) were intellectually honest they would admit that a half of trillion dollars investment in GenAI and its infrastructure

• has not solved the alignment problem
• has not

The statement and the conversation it references engage in public discourse about the state of AI technology, its limitations, and ethical concerns. The discussion involves critiques of AI benchmarks and the alignment problem, highlighting the need for transparency and intellectual honesty in AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and comments aim to critique and analyze the current state of AI, which aligns with striving to do no harm by promoting awareness of potential issues. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The discussion promotes understanding by addressing complex AI issues and encouraging further exploration and dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation includes some dismissive language ('Nonsense'), which could be seen as a minor violation of engaging in constructive criticism. [-1]