Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 83

@TheGoldenAnvil i can’t even see what prompt you started with, and notice that it didn’t do it with one go, and doubt that naive users could same result.

the point is that if naive users use it they can’t trust the output.

and can you, if you don’t already know the answer?

5/30/2025, 1:46:32 AM

In reply to:

TheGoldenAnchor

@TheGoldenAnvil

235d

@GaryMarcus Gary gary gary ( and other onlookers )
I agree with many of your opinions and respect you
This however, using the webui for the models is not it

Have a look here, done just now with a swarm of diff roles taking an agentic approach. One simple LLM does not intelligence make.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

235d

Free version of ChatGPT is still crazy, after all these years

The statement critiques the reliability of AI-generated outputs, particularly for naive users. It questions the trustworthiness of AI results without prior knowledge, suggesting skepticism about AI's capabilities.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not cause harm but raises concerns about potential misinformation from AI outputs.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by highlighting the limitations of AI for users who may not be familiar with its workings. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technology without personal attacks. [+1]