Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement expresses strong disapproval of a political nomination, using harsh language to criticize both the nominee and the administration's vetting process. It reflects a tone of frustration and concern over the nominee's past associations and views.
- The statement uses harsh language, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, thus not fully adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the nominee, using derogatory terms that could be considered disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than focusing on specific issues or policies. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.