Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
5/30/2025, 1:03:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Emmanuel ONYECHE
@Ashibuoguh
·
44d
@marwilliamson @DeAngelisCorey More waste is not the response to waste
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
45d
@DeAngelisCorey this “taxpayer money” ruse is so ridiculous. Your taxpayer money is funding third yachts and penthouses for billionaires and you don’t seem to mind?
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
45d
@marwilliamson Discuss whatever you want. Don't force taxpayers to fund racist indoctrination.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
45d
@DeAngelisCorey So you think it’s basically OK for the government to tell people what they can and cannot discuss, and you think you’re doing the work of ethical journalism by “exposing” a fellow citizen for saying she’s going to talk about whatever she wants to talk about because this is a free
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
46d
BREAKING: Undercover journalists caught an administrator at UNC bragging about pushing DEI despite it being banned.

She says staff just "FINESSE" the language.

They do "work that is COVERT."

The university provost RAN AWAY when confronted.

I have the video.
Buckle up 👇🧵

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the use of taxpayer money and government spending, which are public issues. It critiques the allocation of funds for personal or non-essential purposes by public figures, implying a need for accountability and transparency.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of public figures' spending habits.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but criticizes public spending.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of government spending issues but lacks empathy or compassion in its delivery. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not attack individuals personally, focusing instead on actions and policies. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to highlight issues of public spending, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by discussing public spending issues responsibly. [+1]