Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
5/30/2025, 4:33:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Brent
@Badger2084
·
42d
@marwilliamson @DeAngelisCorey I'm with ya' sister! When we discussed the origins of the Covid virus and the dangers of the so-called "vaccines", our own gov't censored us, fired us, deplatformed us, disbarred us and in some cases even tried to jail us.

Wait a sec... are we talking about the same thing?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
43d
@DeAngelisCorey So you think it’s basically OK for the government to tell people what they can and cannot discuss, and you think you’re doing the work of ethical journalism by “exposing” a fellow citizen for saying she’s going to talk about whatever she wants to talk about because this is a free
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
43d
BREAKING: Undercover journalists caught an administrator at UNC bragging about pushing DEI despite it being banned.

She says staff just "FINESSE" the language.

They do "work that is COVERT."

The university provost RAN AWAY when confronted.

I have the video.
Buckle up 👇🧵

The statement 'Yes, actually' is a brief affirmation in a conversation about government censorship and free speech related to COVID-19 discussions. It is part of a broader dialogue on public issues such as government control, censorship, and freedom of speech, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but it aligns with a conversation that could potentially spread misinformation about vaccines, which could indirectly cause harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a simple affirmation without elaboration.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement touches on the principle of free speech, affirming the right to discuss controversial topics, but does not elaborate on responsible use of this freedom. [+1]