Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is an op-ed that discusses the potential threat to democracy posed by the alliance between Silicon Valley and the US government, particularly in light of a Republican tax bill that would prevent states from regulating AI for a decade. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with significant public issues related to technology, governance, and democracy.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on a policy critique rather than personal attacks.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of the potential risks associated with the alliance between Silicon Valley and the government, fostering public debate. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a policy without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the implications of the tax bill. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's platform to raise awareness about a significant societal issue, potentially contributing to the betterment of society by encouraging public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.