Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement engages in a discussion about the impact of AI, which is a public issue. The tone is dismissive of opposing views, labeling them as 'dopey, empty ad hominem,' which suggests a lack of constructive engagement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others, but the dismissive tone could contribute to a negative discourse environment.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but dismisses opposing views as 'dopey,' which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism, instead dismissing opposing views without addressing their substance. [-2]