Reposted by Jake Tapper š¦
The statement by Sanders critiques Harris's campaign strategy, suggesting it was out of touch with the working class and aligned with elite figures like Liz Cheney and billionaires. This is a substantive engagement with public issues, specifically addressing political campaign strategies and their alignment with public needs.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does criticize Harris's campaign strategy, which could be seen as a negative portrayal.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize a public figure's campaign strategy.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily a critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of Harris's campaign strategy, which is a form of public discourse, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses Sanders's influence to critique a political campaign, which could be seen as an attempt to better align political strategies with the needs of the working class.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses Sanders's platform to express a political opinion responsibly.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.