Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by referencing a debate on the influence of political ideologies on institutions, specifically universities, and the role of social media in moderating content. It uses a historical quote to contrast with a modern perspective, highlighting the tension between moderation and commercial interests.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language ('Fuck that') which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The use of profanity and the dismissive tone could be interpreted as disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of respecting the dignity of others. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses a historical perspective with a crude remark. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a dismissive tone rather than fostering discussion. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given the dismissive and crude language. [-1]