Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with the ongoing debate about the capabilities and limitations of AI, specifically addressing skepticism towards AI advancements. The tone is optimistic and somewhat dismissive of skepticism, suggesting that recent developments in AI have addressed previous concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone towards skepticism could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards those who hold skeptical views, as it dismisses their concerns without engaging with them. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but fails to constructively address the skepticism, instead opting for a dismissive tone. [-1]