Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the impact of AI on employment and the development of AGI. It questions why a specific individual hasn't engaged with certain literature, implying a need for new ideas in AI development. The tone is somewhat confrontational, suggesting a critique of the individual's contributions to the discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a lack of contribution, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it challenges the individual's engagement without constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of personal critique rather than constructive criticism, focusing on the individual's actions rather than the broader issue. [-1]