Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement criticizes the New York Times for allegedly downplaying the significance of a military attack by comparing it to the attack on Pearl Harbor. The tone is critical and implies a lack of adequate reporting by the media outlet.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by potentially trivializing a historical event and escalating tensions through its comparison. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved in the historical event it references, potentially causing distress. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the media but does so in a way that could be seen as inflammatory rather than constructive. [-1]