In reply to:
ᐸGerardSans/ᐳ🚀🇬🇧
@gerardsans
·
225d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the interpretation of data and the tone of a previous comment in a discussion about AI progress. The tone is critical and defensive, aiming to correct what is perceived as a misunderstanding or misrepresentation.
- The statement aims to correct a perceived error, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by clarifying a misunderstanding. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement is somewhat respectful but borders on being dismissive by labeling the previous comment as 'rude and misguided.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but could be more constructive by avoiding personal judgments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.