Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Lindsey Graham
@LindseyGrahamSC
·
17d
The statement criticizes a tweet by a U.S. Senator, suggesting it is extreme and implies a call for violence against activists. It addresses public issues related to political discourse, activism, and international relations, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement accuses the Senator of promoting harm, which itself could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. However, it does not directly promote harm itself.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the public actions of a politician rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting perceived extremism in political discourse, though its tone is accusatory.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the Senator's tweet but does so in a manner that could be seen as a personal attack, calling it 'unhinged.'Â [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to draw attention to what it perceives as dangerous rhetoric, aiming for societal betterment by advocating against violence. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to critique a public figure's statement, using the platform to address a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.