Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critical commentary on Israel's response to allegations of violence, suggesting a pattern of denial and obfuscation. It addresses public issues related to international conflict and media narratives, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement uses charged language like 'murdered' and 'butchered,' which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than fostering understanding. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved, as it uses accusatory and harsh language that could be interpreted as a form of verbal attack. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on assigning blame and creating a narrative of intentional confusion without offering constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes strong accusations without providing evidence or inviting discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive, given its accusatory tone and lack of evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.