Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
6/3/2025, 3:57:40 PM
X
In reply to:
David Manheim
@davidmanheim
路
222d
@tdietterich @GaryMarcus 1. I'm noting that we've moved the bar.
2. If we wait for Gary's definition (the system is superhuman across every task, and can learn new tasks,) before we worry about misaligned AGI - because it's not "True AGI" - we won't have time to apply the label before we're all dead.
Thomas G. Dietterich
@tdietterich
路
222d
@davidmanheim @GaryMarcus Why do these criteria even matter? Is something valuable supposed to happen when we match average human performance?
David Manheim
@davidmanheim
路
222d
@GaryMarcus 1. I agree that the systems are very limited - but the term AGI was initially contrasted with ANI, and it's silly to claim that current systems are narrow, even if they are not "True AGI"
2. Your bar keeps being human expert, not human average. That seems unreasonably high.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
223d
饾棫饾椀饾棽 饾棸饾槀饾椏饾椏饾棽饾椈饾榿饾椆饾槅 饾棾饾棶饾榾饾椀饾椂饾椉饾椈饾棶饾棷饾椆饾棽 饾椂饾棻饾棽饾棶 饾榿饾椀饾棶饾榿 饾槃饾棽 饾椀饾棶饾槂饾棽 饾棶饾椆饾椏饾棽饾棶饾棻饾槅 饾棶饾棸饾椀饾椂饾棽饾槂饾棽饾棻 饾棓饾棜饾棞 饾椉饾椏 饾棶饾椏饾棽 饾棶饾椆饾椏饾棽饾棶饾棻饾槅 饾棽饾槄饾榿饾椏饾棽饾椇饾棽饾椆饾槅 饾棸饾椆饾椉饾榾饾棽 饾椂饾榾 饾棶饾棷饾榾饾槀饾椏饾棻. 饾棝饾棽饾椏饾棽 饾椂饾榾 饾槃饾椀饾槅:

1. True AGI [Artificial General Intelligence] ought to be

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the definition and implications of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), engaging with public concerns about AI development and its potential risks. The tone is analytical and aims to clarify the criteria for AGI, contributing to a nuanced debate on a significant technological and ethical issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a reasoned debate, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the definition of AGI, contributing to a more informed discussion.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the topic rather than individuals.聽[+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly contributing to a public debate on AGI.聽[+1]