Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/3/2025, 4:06:51 PM
X
In reply to:
Tony Princato
@TPrincato
·
32d
@marwilliamson @Kim_99xo I’m talking on a per capita basis.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
32d
@TPrincato @Kim_99xo The Americans killed 1 million Iraqis. Putin has killed half a million Ukrainians. There is no contest here.
Tony Princato
@TPrincato
·
32d
@marwilliamson @Kim_99xo Speaking of death cults, Jews just killed 40,000 people. On a per capita basis, it’s the most bloodthirsty religion in the world.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
32d
@Kim_99xo There is no love where there is no justice. The situation has been festering for many years, although those who say it’s simple and black and white either do not understand or are willfully ignoring reality. At this point there needs to be an international consortium primarily by
Kim
@Kim_99xo
·
32d
@marwilliamson With so much division and hurt, how does the collective unconscious return to love?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
32d
We seem to have gone from calling for justice for Palestinians - a call with which I wholeheartedly agree - to an absurd romanticization of a gigantic death cult. That cult is not just coming for the Jews. Those who continue yelling “We’re not antisemites!!!” while at least

The statement 'I’m sorry, but that’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard' is a response to a complex and sensitive discussion involving accusations of violence and religious criticism. The tone is dismissive and does not engage substantively with the issues raised, such as the comparison of violence across different groups and the sensitive nature of religious and ethnic discussions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could contribute to a hostile environment. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in hate speech, but it fails to respect the dignity of others by dismissing their perspective without constructive engagement. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the previous comment without addressing the underlying issues or arguments. [-2]