Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement reports on former President Trump's private complaints about Supreme Court justices not supporting his agenda, which is a matter of public interest as it touches on the independence of the judiciary and the expectations of political figures from judicial appointees.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but it reports on a sentiment that could undermine public trust in judicial independence.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not disclosing private conversations verbatim and focuses on the public implications of the sentiment expressed.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a straightforward report of a political figure's dissatisfaction.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it reports on a political issue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By reporting on this issue, the statement uses its influence to inform the public about potential political pressures on the judiciary. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by reporting on a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.