Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
@RepMTG
·
219d
The statement and conversation involve a critique of a legislative proposal that would limit states' rights to regulate AI, which is a public policy issue. The tone is critical and emphasizes state rights.
- The statement aims to prevent potential harm by opposing a policy perceived as overreaching. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a specific legislative concern. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive criticism by opposing the policy based on its content rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.